About The Scream
Although this fact is often forgotten, Munch intended The Scream to be part of a series, known as the Frieze of Life. The series dealt with emotional life, presumably applicable to all modern humans though, in reality, it was applicable to Munch's favorite subject (Edvard Munch). Frieze... explored three different themes -- Love, Anxiety and Death -- through sub-themes in each. The Scream was the the final work of the Love theme, and signified despair. Yes, you read that correctly. According to Munch, despair was the ultimate outcome of love. Make of that what you will.
The Main Figure
Such an unappealing creature! Androgynous, bald, pasty, mouth open in a rictus of pain -- and those hands are obviously not dimming the "scream," which may be internal or external. And if it is the latter, clearly only the figure hears it or the man leaning on the railing in the background would surely have tumbled over it out of fright.
This figure could be no one or anyone; it may be Modern Man, it could be one of Munch's deceased parents, or it might be his mentally ill sister. Most likely it represents Munch himself or, rather, what was going on in his head. To be fair, he had a family history of poor physical and mental health, and thought about these specters of doom with unwise frequency. He had father and mother "issues," and he also had an acquired history of alcohol abuse. Combine the histories, and his psyche was very often a mess.
We do know that this scene had a real location, an overlook along a road traversing the Ekeberg hill, southeast of Oslo. From this vantage point one can see Oslo, the Oslo Fjord, and the island of Hovedøya. Munch would have been familiar with the neighborhood because his younger sister, Laura, had been committed to an insane asylum there on February 29, 1892.
How Many Versions of The Scream Exist?
There are four colored versions, as well as a black and white lithographic stone Munch created in 1895.
- 1893: Munch created two Screams this year.
One, arguably the most well-known version, was done in tempera on cardboard. It was stolen on February 12, 1994, from the collection of the The National Museum of Art, Architecture and Design, Oslo. This Scream was recovered three months later during an undercover sting operation, and returned to the museum. Because the thieves cut the wires affixing the painting to the Museum's wall (rather than manhandling the painting itself), it was unharmed.
The other 1893 version was done in crayon on cardboard -- and to be honest, no one is positive which version Munch did first. We do know that this drawing's colors aren't vibrant and it looks less finished than the others. Perhaps this lack of pizazz explains why it has never been stolen from the Munch-Museet (Munch Museum), Oslo.
- 1895: The version we are looking at here, and easily the most colorful one. It is in its original frame, on which Munch inscribed the following:
I was walking along the road with two friends. The Sun was setting – The Sky turned a bloody red And I felt a whiff of Melancholy – I stood Still, deathly tired – over the blue-black Fjord and City hung Blood and Tongues of Fire My Friends walked on – I remained behind – shivering with Anxiety – I felt the great Scream in Nature E.M.
Never stolen or mishandled, this Scream was in a private collection from 1937 until it sold at auction on May 2, 2012, during the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale at Sotheby's, New York. The hammer price with buyer's premium was a jaw-dropping 119,922,500 (USD).
- Circa 1910: Probably painted in response to the popularity of earlier versions, this Scream was done in tempera, oil, and crayon on cardboard. It became headline news on August 22, 2004, when armed robbers stole both it and Munch's Madonna from the Munch-Museet, Oslo. Both pieces were recovered in 2006, but sustained damage from the thieves during the theft and while in poor storage conditions prior to their recovery.
Did you notice that all of the versions were done on cardboard? There was a reason for this. Munch used cardboard out of necessity at the beginning of his career; it was much less expensive than canvas. Later, when he could easily afford canvas, he often used cardboard instead just because he liked -- and had grown accustomed to -- its texture.
This version of The Scream was done in pastels on cardboard.
Munch is nearly always classified as a Symbolist, but make no mistake about The Scream: this is Expressionism in one of its most shining hours. (True, there was no Expressionism the Movement in the 1890s. Bear with me a minute, please.)
Why? Munch didn't lay down a faithful reproduction of the landscape surrounding the Oslo Fjord. The background figures are unidentifiable, and the central figure barely looks human. The turbulent, vivid sky may -- but probably doesn't -- represent Munch's memories of phenomenal sunsets a decade earlier, when ash from the 1883 eruption of Krakatoa circumnavigated the globe in the upper atmosphere. None of this is relevant.
What registers is a jarring combination of colors and mood. It makes us uncomfortable, just as the artist intended. The Scream shows us how Munch felt when he created it, and that is Expressionism in a nutshell.
Prideaux, Sue. Edvard Munch: Behind the Scream.
New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.
Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale Lot Notes, Sotheby's, New York