1. Education

Discuss in my forum

Shelley Esaak

Who Killed Vincent van Gogh?

By , About.com GuideOctober 17, 2011

Follow me on:

Vincent van Gogh - Self-Portrait with Bandaged Ear and Pipe, January, 1889

CBS sent notice last week that is would be airing a Vincent van Gogh story on 60 Minutes last night, so I tuned in out of curiosity. Essentially, the story involved not only Vincent, but the new 976-page biography Van Gogh by co-authors Steven Naifeh and Greg Smith, who won the Pulitzer Prize for their 1989 book Jackson Pollock: An American Saga. So before we go any further, please know that Naifeh and Smith already had serious research creds and spent 10 years doing the same for Van Gogh. All set? Great.

Well, the 60 Minutes piece concerned itself with a synopsis of Vincent's life, a confirmation of Dr. Felix Rey's diagnosis (temporal lobe epilepsy, which had only recently been identified in 1890), and then lingered long on his death -- by suicide, we have believed for over a century. Ah, but! Not so fast, say Naifeh and Smith. I don't want to give away too much (you really should view the videos for yourself), but the authors do not feel that Vincent took his own life. And I have to say, seeing the one mile trek from the wheat field outside of Auvers back to his rented room ... it is rather hard to imagine walking that far, over such bumpy terrain while losing blood after being gut-shot. If their theory holds true, it will come as something of a relief; it has always bothered me that poor Vincent, after a lifetime of batting 1.000 in the failure category, even managed to bungle his own suicide.

One last thought. Morley Safer intoned that this would "upend art history." I disagree. History is wondrously accommodating when it comes to new evidence.

View "The Life and Death of Vincent van Gogh" Image Credit:

Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853-1890)
Self-Portrait with Bandaged Ear and Pipe, January, 1889
Oil on canvas
51 x 45 cm (20 x 17 11/16 in.)
Niarchos Collection, Athens, Greece

Comments

October 17, 2011 at 7:10 am
(1) Bern :

I was going to send you a link to UK’s “Mail Online” website on this story when I saw that you had already “scooped” me. That’s first-class blogging, Shelley.
You know, it’s possible to look at Van Gogh’s story in a positive light, that is, contrary to the conventional presentation of “poor Vincent, unappreciated, broke, crazy, selling only one painting in his lifetime”, etc. Consider, instead, the love shown him by his brother Theo. Theo, the unsung hero, who supported his brother to the end, and by so doing gave us the immortal Van Gogh.

October 17, 2011 at 11:11 am
(2) John :

Saw the show. Thought it was just a lot of conjecture and supposition. People who tell you that they know what happened 100 years ago do not impress me. I don’t know if the suicide story is true or not but I don’t know that these guys are correct either. I love Vincent’s work and that is what is important to me.

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.